3 ms·
> 4K doesn't even get listed, presumably lumped into the "Other" category. Could the chart be reporting CSS pixels rather than hardware pixels? Macs are only 7
by extra88 9y ago
> 4K doesn't even get listed, presumably lumped into the "Other" category.
Could the chart be reporting CSS pixels rather than hardware pixels? Macs are only 7% of total Firefox users but the majority of Mac hardware has a "Retina" display with a higher resolution than these.
BTW, 2560x1440 is listed with about ~1% but it's not visible because the line and text is black on a black background.
- StanislavPetrov 9y agoI've been using 2560x1080 for almost a year now and will never go back. 21:9 is the way to go.
- Viper007Bond 9y agoWhat size is that? I run a 34" 3440x1440 21:9 and it's nearly a bit too wide. EDIT: https://www.asus.com/us/ROG-Republic-Of-Gamers/ROG-SWIFT-PG348Q/ https://www.asus.com/us/ROG-Republic-Of-Gamers/ROG-SWIFT-PG3... 100Hz is awesome, even for just browsing the web.
- StanislavPetrov 9y agoIts 29". I've had many monitors, both bigger and smaller, and this is by far the best I've had for gaming and everything else. Exact model: http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-29UM68-P-ultrawide-monitor http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-29UM68-P-ultrawide-monitor
- jsgo 9y agoI have the same monitor and it is the first time I've started to run Windows apps more in actual windows than full screen/full screen-like. Too many sites waste a bunch of horizontal space on it, so makes sense to shrink the window. Great monitor though. Both for gaming and for general usage.