3 ms·
I don't agree with this. Dynamic linking is perfectly reasonable for OS libraries like kernel32.dll, for instance. Dynamic vs. static linking is a tradeoff like
by pcwalton 9y ago
I don't agree with this. Dynamic linking is perfectly reasonable for OS libraries like kernel32.dll, for instance. Dynamic vs. static linking is a tradeoff like any other.
- monocasa 9y agoSure, but NT is a totally different story since you just aren't given another stable ABI other than linking against .dlls. But there is a lot of value on Unixen of static linking (or only linking against VDSO equivalents).