4 ms·
(sorry to duplicate my comment here, but it's relevant) It's not just a matter of vanity, it's a matter of extremely loose tolerances in manufacturing. I've f
by CWuestefeld 16y ago
(sorry to duplicate my comment here, but it's relevant)
It's not just a matter of vanity, it's a matter of extremely loose tolerances in manufacturing.
I've found that even within a single store, looking at the same model of Levi's jeans, I need to try each individual pair. I always wear the same thing: Levi's 505 34W 30L. But I find that individual specimens with this exact tag can be as much as an inch different in every dimension: waist diameter, inseam length, and even leg diameter at the hem.
This being the case, it's not possible to say that a given item is the right fit, without actually trying it.
- kleevr 16y agoPerhaps, they should find a way to (re)measure the final product, and re-label as necessary.
- Splines 16y agoBut if you have a clothing portal that knows your every dimension, part of the service you can sell is that you measure every single item, ensuring a good fit (regardless of the size tag). Whether you match them up to the customer on shipping or to the database on receiving is up to you. I have no idea if that would be scalable, but it would certainly help with customer retention and goodwill.
- achompas 16y agoIt's not loose tolerances in manufacturing--it's just shitty quality control. Sorry to be so vulgar, but it's true. Tons of boutiques and higher-end clothing labels have almost ZERO variance in sizing. Some of them hand-make their clothing, sure, but most don't. Regardless, though, you're right--there's too much variance in sizing for mainstream brands. This problem really hinders any type of "OpenID-for-clothing" startup.
- LogicHoleFlaw 16y agoThis is valuable information. Do you have any insight into the manufacturing process for garments? I don't yet know enough about the clothing industry and manufacturing so any data points are very welcome. I firmly believe that problems like these must be surmountable. We have the technology to build devices with tolerances measured in microns. Surely we can find a way to get clothes to fit.
- mbreese 16y agoIt simply isn't practical. We have technology to build devices with micron tolerances, but they cost millions of dollars. Sure, you could build a device to sew a pair of jeans with millimeter tolerances, but you'd have to be so precise that you'd have to charge thousands for a single pair. That's not even looking at the material itself. Different fabrics can have different tolerances for stretching in all directions. It is a big tradeoff between accuracy and cost. If you want to have the measurements be hyper-accurate, be prepared to spend a ton.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- mhb 16y agoI've also found that Levi's have become so bad in this regard that I had to change to Lee's which seem much better. I think Levi's quality control went away about when they started selling to Walmart.
- matrix 16y agoLarge brands like Levi's generally use several contractors, and the quality (and therefore fit tolerance) inevitably varies from contractor to contractor. Chances are that was a bad batch and/or you were shopping in an outlet mall (where they send a lot of the odds and sods).