4 ms·
Interesing to see how little customers can do to stop them. As they are always in the red they never attracted enough customers for their business case. Neverth
by theyinwhy 9y ago
Interesing to see how little customers can do to stop them.
As they are always in the red they never attracted enough customers for their business case. Nevertheless they always are able to get fresh money. The customer is irrelevant and left out of the equation. It is the shareholders that bet on the future no matter how dire the present is. That really speaks volumes about how capitalism works and is depressing as there is nothing you can do to boykott this company.
- perl4ever 9y agoCapitalism has resulted in us drowning in capital. This seems to me to be a statement about its success, not its failure(s). Would the alternative (scarce, expensive capital) be better?
- theyinwhy 9y agoI am pretty sure you are not talking about the majority here when referring to "us".
- mnm1 9y agoWhy should we need to boycott a company like this? The government should prevent them from operating, otherwise it has failed at its job. In this case, this has led to a death, which is still probably not enough for the government to intervene permanently. Seems too me like the failure here is completely with the government failing to do its job of regulating and protecting people. Given enough cash, I'm not surprised and am prepared to see many more people die at the hands of companies like uber without any serious consequences whatsoever for the company.