3 ms·
I work at a company where we have been doing this sort of stuff for a while now. It's very impressive in the case of Google because of the size of its index an
by danielnicollet 16y ago
I work at a company where we have been doing this sort of stuff for a while now. It's very impressive in the case of Google because of the size of its index and the level of error tolerance of the matching sequence used. I wonder how complete these instant results are compared to the now lame old click-to-submit search results? I tried to test and noticed the count of instant results is slightly smaller but the top items appear to be the same most of the time.
Anyone has insights?
- origoterra 16y agoWell speed is nice but I sure don't want to loose quality of search results for that. Google is fast enough as it is. I would say that it's probably unfeasible to process a query over the full web index so there some amount of corner cutting going on here. What type?