> This is completely irrelevant and false. I, for one, would be generally dubious about making such a strong statement against something the NTSB has stated: i

> This is completely irrelevant and false. I, for one, would be generally dubious about making such a strong statement against something the NTSB has stated: it may well be the case that the system as designed should work as you describe, but why do they believe otherwise? Was there some flaw in the system?