I skimmed over the article, read 10 random paragraphs in full. Looks like the kind of article I'm not likely to learn much from or otherwise find very entertain

I skimmed over the article, read 10 random paragraphs in full. Looks like the kind of article I'm not likely to learn much from or otherwise find very entertaining. It's about 6500 words. And these are the 17 you take issue with: and I even independently came up with it when I was about 13 years old, in 1973. I'm fairly convinced if I pay enough attention to anyone I'll find something to criticise them about, but that generally doesn't say anything about the quality or impact of their work in the world. Do you have anything substantive to say about the article itself?