2 ms·
Here in London, Cloudflare seems a bit faster: $ ping 1.1.1.1 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.793 m
by Reason077 9y ago
Here in London, Cloudflare seems a bit faster:
$ ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.793 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.010 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.789 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.963 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.954 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.330 ms
^C
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.330/2.640/3.010/0.592 ms
$ ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=6.531 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=5.956 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=7.300 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=7.457 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=6.796 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=6.785 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 5.956/6.804/7.457/0.494 ms