This code implements RFC 5348-style TCP friendly rate limiting [0]. Is your concern about the implementation being wrong, or about the algorithm in 5348 somehow

This code implements RFC 5348-style TCP friendly rate limiting [0]. Is your concern about the implementation being wrong, or about the algorithm in 5348 somehow being insufficiently fair? [0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5348 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5348