>> The driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive > What they are saying is that while he was driving there was a

>> The driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive > What they are saying is that while he was driving there was an earlier point at which the car did not crash, where the car gave a visual and audible clues. And you have to ask? Why the hell is that relevant? I see it being relevant that the driver had his follow distance set to the lowest and that several times in the drive prior to the accident he had to be prompted to maintain his hands on the wheel. This speaks to a driver that wasn't paying attention like they were supposed to be doing. That would increase the likelihood of him missing an upcoming hazard and responding in time. Regardless of that, if he had reported and issue in that area to Tesla, why the hell was he not driving it himself at the time? I know that I personally value my life enough that I wouldn't trust AP if it had been veering into the wall repeatedly in one area.