3 ms·
The statement was that you will not get better performance than memsql, not about which is cheaper.
by shaklee3 9y ago
The statement was that you will not get better performance than memsql, not about which is cheaper.
- manigandham 9y agoAs written: "Performance will be similar but there are differences in functionality like kdb's asof joins that can't really be compared." Also the original post only mentioned MemSQL, Citus, and CockroachDB. With those, MemSQL is the fastest.