3 ms·

So you could say, they value their privacy and don't want their comments shared with people they didn't authorize? It's ironic to see employees complaining abo

So you could say, they value their privacy and don't want their comments shared with people they didn't authorize? It's ironic to see employees complaining about what is essentially a lack of privacy, when the company they work for goes out of its way to convince everybody that privacy is a thing of the past, and in so many words, so does the very Bosworth post they would protect and keep private. Eat your own dog food. And then one of them says that whoever leaked the post (the whistleblower, is how I would refer to them) lacks integrity. Integrity? You work for Facebook. Has it never occurred to you that maybe you're the baddies?

greenyoda 9y ago
The word "integrity" may have a different meaning inside a tightly-knit corporate culture[1] than on the outside, just like "honor" means something different inside the Mafia, where it means "you can steal and murder, but above all, keep your mouth shut". A corporate code of silence that insists on the absolute privacy of internal communications is similar to the Mafia's code of silence, in which it's considered bad form (punishable by death) to blab to the authorities: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omert%C3%A0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omert%C3%A0 "Omertà is a code of honor that places importance on silence, non-cooperation with authorities, and non-interference in the illegal actions of others." It will be interesting to see what kind of documents this and other whistleblowers will decide to leak in the future. Facebook needs its own Snowden to expose its inner workings. [1] I suspect that the corporate obsession with secrecy we're seeing here is not unique to Facebook. What's unique is the irony of a privacy-destroying company insisting on its own right to privacy.