3 ms·
I'm really curious about > Mother Teresa as the sole artistic[...] oh, wait. What do you mean? I just don't understand if you're saying whether we should only
by lomnakkus 9y ago
I'm really curious about
> Mother Teresa as the sole artistic[...] oh, wait.
What do you mean? I just don't understand if you're saying whether we should only look to (supposedly) flawless people, or... what? If it's the former then I submit that there's a pretty long way from "not flawless" to "paedophile".
The reason I ask, is that I think it's acknowledged pretty widely that Mother Teresa was actually a pretty flawed person who, through blind faith and belief, actually worsened the suffering of those in her care, and perhaps even caused the deaths of people who actually had treatable diseases, etc. etc. There's quite a lot of interesting things: [0]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa
- RickS 9y agoI think that's what the poster means. If you disqualify impactful people who are imperfect, you have disqualified all people.