4 ms·
Where did you get China Telecom from? The IANA released 1.0.0.0/8 to APNIC in 2010 and 1.1.1.0/24 was assigned to APNIC-LABS. The IRR Netname is actually still
by bogomipz 9y ago
Where did you get China Telecom from? The IANA released 1.0.0.0/8 to APNIC in 2010 and 1.1.1.0/24 was assigned to APNIC-LABS. The IRR Netname is actually still APNIC-LABS too. See:
https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.1.1#tabId=at-a-glance https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.1.1#tabId=at-a-glance
- bringtheaction 9y ago> The IRR Netname is actually still APNIC-LABS too. This is consistent with information on the page. > 1.1.1.1 is a partnership between Cloudflare and APNIC.
- mrb 9y agoThe IANA released 1.0.0.0/8 to APNIC, and APNIC subsequently sold parts of it to China Telecom. I deduct this because neighboring IP ranges (https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.0.0#tabId=at-a-glance https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.0.0#tabId=at-a-glance and https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.2.0#tabId=at-a-glance https://stat.ripe.net/1.1.2.0#tabId=at-a-glance) belong to China Telecom. So 1.1.1.0 likely did too. I think the whois information may have reflected the China Telecom ownership before it was updated. APNIC-LABS is probably just a joint partner in that Cloudflare resolver project.
- tialaramex 9y agoNo. 1.1.1.0/24 was not allocated because idiots poisoned it. For a long time address ranges like these were left unused because it wasn't worth anybody's time handling the problems but since IPv4 is now full we may as well do what we can with them. So China Telecom will never have been given 1.1.1.0/24
- bogomipz 9y agoIndeed, and there was always great worry about how polluted that IP space might be. I posted this link elsewhere: https://www.merit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/1.0.0.08.pdf https://www.merit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/1.0.0.08.pd...
- mrb 9y agoVery insightful slides. I was wrong about 1.1.1.0/8