3 ms·
My last point was that DNS is supposed to be decentralized. With a properly decentralized system, censorship becomes very difficult. We shouldn't rely on someon
by eis 9y ago
My last point was that DNS is supposed to be decentralized. With a properly decentralized system, censorship becomes very difficult. We shouldn't rely on someone like Cloudflare or Google to provide us with DNS services.
- ocdtrekkie 9y agoIt's a decentralized service, but at the end of the day, your PC's going to check one address. If it's not Cloudflare/Google/Quad9/etc., you're just going to be checking against your ISP. It's pretty beneficial, especially in certain countries, to have alternatives to the ISP's DNS.
- scrollaway 9y agoSo what's your thinking here? Cloudflare shouldn't offer to be one of the many pillars of that properly decentralized system? I don't believe we are going to suddenly flock to cloudflare to provide all dns ever. Between ISPs hardcoding or force-defaulting their own (awful) dns servers, and the amount of geeks and IT techs who have memorized 8.8.8.8, we're safe for a long time. And if I'm wrong on that, that wouldn't speak highly of the "decentralized" nature of DNS, would it?