4 ms·
There's also Quad9 that I saw in an article earlier (not sure if it was on HN).
by m-p-3 9y ago
There's also Quad9 that I saw in an article earlier (not sure if it was on HN).
- cm2187 9y agoMy personal experience is that I had reliability problems that I didn’t have with Google. And DNS is a critical step in the connection for which you really want reliability.
- gerdesj 9y agoAnd mine is the opposite. I have not seen reliability problems with Quad9. Use cases are different - Quad9 for "nasty" filtered and 8.8.8.8 for err probably not filtered. Do it yourself otherwise.
- stordoff 9y agoQuad9 blocks malicious domains by default, which is probably fine for most, but may not be wanted in all use cases.
- mnx 9y agoThey also provide 9.9.9.10, which doesn't have a blocklist. https://www.quad9.net/faq/#Is_there_a_service_that_Quad9_offers_that_does_not_have_the_blocklist_or_other_security https://www.quad9.net/faq/#Is_there_a_service_that_Quad9_off...
- sashametro 9y agoHowever, 9.9.9.10 does not perform DNSSEC validation, as 8.8.8.8 (Google), 64.6.64.6 (Verisign), 9.9.9.9 (Quad9), and now 1.1.1.1 (CloudFlare) do, so results may not be as trustworthy.
- DesertBattery 9y agoIt does. $ dig @9.9.9.10 +dnssec +short verisignlabs.com 72.13.58.64 A 8 2 3600 20180413202737 20180330202737 31485 verisignlabs.com. KrnT9i6qytaYWDZWThBmBwc6anOmawNxJTxmSlpaY3L7Yfupga9FS70l 8nMVp8ggbEtA+CnS9AbNwObkPaYvk3nFpDvo4C+2hg+PECsP1HVTgGxl G3eblfnYAMNfYzLYlfUnSBgM7kLSIXY4rLBxsl01KiPJYezNhmQ53KYf ygs=