4 ms·
Unfortunately, the judge can't consider that. He didn't rule on whether or not the law is a stupid waste of time and money, he ruled that the existing [stupid]
by lawnchair_larry 9y ago
Unfortunately, the judge can't consider that. He didn't rule on whether or not the law is a stupid waste of time and money, he ruled that the existing [stupid] law, as written, applies.
Someone else should get a ballot measure to improve or repeal the law. I think the idea behind the law is good, but the short-sighted implementation makes it useless.
- _jal 9y agoI like imagining a much better world in which we could have a Bureau of Stupid Identification. They'd have no power other than to point to something some other part of the government did and say, That is Hereby Declared Officially Stupid. It would never work, because we can't have nice things. But a boy can dream.
- cuckcuckspruce 9y agoIf you proposed this it would just become a tool of partisan bickering anyway. This department would spend the first month when a new government is in office declaring everything they ideologically oppose from the previous government as stupid.
- joeblow9999 9y ago" I think the idea behind the law is good, but the short-sighted implementation makes it useless." As with most laws...