2 ms·
>OCaml doesn't have shared memory multicore parallelism because it ignores already researched and widely-implemented solutions? OCaml people definitely not ign
by ernst_klim 9y ago
>OCaml doesn't have shared memory multicore parallelism because it ignores already researched and widely-implemented solutions?
OCaml people definitely not ignore them, they are carefully investigating existing code and elaborating modern and efficient solution [1](unlike Go, which is too opinionated).
[1] https://github.com/ocamllabs/ocaml-multicore/wiki/Memory-model https://github.com/ocamllabs/ocaml-multicore/wiki/Memory-mod...
- ngrilly 9y agoI'm aware of the ongoing work to enable multicore parallelism in OCaml. It's the reason why I mentioned OCaml in my comment. My comment was rhetoric. My apologies if it was not clear. That said, I don't see the link between the work done on OCaml multicore parallelism and Go "being too opinionated"... If I follow you, Go people, unlike OCaml people, are "too opinionated", and don't "carefully investigate existing code" and don't "elaborate modern and efficient code". Do you realize how arrogant (and a bit ridiculous) this sounds?