4 ms·
I'd say products that are only safe if used properly are unsafe products. Being safe is a perfectly good strategy for an individual, but it's asking for troubl
by wyattpeak 9y ago
I'd say products that are only safe if used properly are unsafe products.
Being safe is a perfectly good strategy for an individual, but it's asking for trouble on a societal level.
- striking 9y agoSo do you think Home Depot should close down? They sell hammers.
- perfmode 9y agoYou’re attacking a straw man.
- umanwizard 9y agoHe’s doing “reductiō ad absurdum”, which is not the same thing.
- hnuser1234 9y agoI wonder if he was making the opposite point. That enforcing safety at a society level is not productive.
- cloverich 9y agoI don't think so. Its a common argument that generally available products should be safe by default, not safe because of training. The reply is a bit of a straw man, there's obviously nuances to that stance. In this case, expecting _everyone_ to know exactly how a wire brush is unsafe is not realistic. If there weren't alternatives, well, there wouldn't be much to do. But in this case, there's plenty of safe alternatives to wire brushes, thus a strong argument can be made that they should simply be banned.
- jcims 9y agoWhat would such a ban look like? No wire brushes for BBQs? What about the wire brushes they have in the hardware aisle? Do they need to add 'not for BBQs' to the label? Seems like good fodder for tabloid evening news and then just let it be.
- khedoros1 9y agoMost people are just going to go to the barbecue aisle and find the "safe" brushes. Someone really determined to buy a wire brush might find the rust-scrapers or something, but that's no different from paint thinner not being sold as a household cleaner. It makes sense to me to make the safe option into the easiest, most obvious path to take. Stop labeling wire brushes as "barbecue brushes", and stop stocking them directly alongside the cooking tools. That's the form I imagine a ban would take.
- hnuser1234 9y agoAh yeah, re-read it and realize I misunderstood.
- emodendroket 9y agoI'd think so if all their hammers had heads that went flying off if you used them at a slightly wrong angle.
- wyattpeak 9y agoNo, that's a (mostly) fair point. I'd distinguish between objects whose dangers are obvious and those whose aren't. The danger of hammers is obvious. You know to treat them safely, and so there's comparatively little trouble. The possibility of having an untreatable needle stuck in your throat unless you use your tools in the right order is rather less so. I didn't say anything about banning unsafe objects, however. I think there's a case to be made for it if they're easily replaceable, but that's not the point I put forward.
- conductr 9y agoAs an aside on the BBQ brushes & Home Depot. This seems like a great consumer education opportunity that could build some goodwill. Surely HD, or at least the HD merchandising team, is aware of this issue.
- neolefty 9y agoIs there a trade-off between safety and usefulness? Chainsaws, C compilers, C-4 ... Certain industries would be crippled without these tools. Safety training helps.
- kbutler 9y agoMore of a trade-off between flexibility, cost, and safety. Safety features tend to constrain or eliminate various uses, which may be needed in some cases. Alternatively, safety features may be expensive (e.g., the mechanism that instantly stops a table saw when it touches flesh). In some cases, great design can improve safety at low cost while retaining utility.
- wongarsu 9y agoC4 is a much safer alternative to TNT, and TNT was used widely to replace the much unsafer Nitroglycerin. The question shouldn't be "is this safe", but rather "does a much safer alternative exist that works almost as good or even better"
- msla 9y agoThere's a big difference between a tool only sold to people in a specific industry, and not generally available, and a tool available at retail outlets which is meant to be used by the general public. (And with one thing you mentioned, C compilers, the tool itself isn't dangerous, but the artifacts you can create using the tool can be dangerous. This is why aerospace software, for example, has a lot of procedure around it.)
- dsfyu404ed 9y ago>I'd say products that are only safe if used properly That's literally every product ever. I challenge you to come up with an example of something that's readily available to the general public that cannot reliably cause harm or death if used in a sufficiently ignorant way. People intentionally eat Tide Pods. Should we ban all cleaning products that an average person is capable of injecting a lethal amount of?