I chuckled, but - to be fair - Gruber's article hardly suggests that Ping is "smarter than you think" or that it will "prove the naysayers wrong". In fact, I f

I chuckled, but - to be fair - Gruber's article hardly suggests that Ping is "smarter than you think" or that it will "prove the naysayers wrong". In fact, I find the meekness of the article interesting. Maybe it's an acknowledgement of Ping's lack of current success that Gruber couldn't think of anything more exciting than "Here are some general ideas for why Ping might grow some day."