I totally agree with you. I think part of the problem is that technical people tend to understand that aviation autopilots are supervised assist mechanisms, wh

I totally agree with you. I think part of the problem is that technical people tend to understand that aviation autopilots are supervised assist mechanisms, whether via indirect knowledge or direct knowledge. Aviation is a common interest among technical people, and flying is a reasonably popular hobby in Silicon Valley, at least compared to areas with more typical incomes. From that POV, sure, what Tesla offers is pretty comparable to a plane's autopilot. But the popular conception of autopilot is much different, closer to an autonomous robot that makes the pilot completely superfluous, and that's what needs to be considered. Even if it weren't an actual hazard (which I think it is) to set that expectation, that perception is probably not doing Tesla's image any favors as it tends to remove any assumption of responsibility for an accident from the human driver. From a strictly business standpoint, it feels like the wrong move.