2 ms·
It seems to me that if you replace "whom other" with "that" you end up with a similar meaning: people that people bully bully people I've found it fairly
by artlogic 16y ago
It seems to me that if you replace "whom other" with "that" you end up with a similar meaning:
people that people bully bully people
I've found it fairly common to hear people drop the "that" when speaking - so in this case:
people people bully...
the first people refers to the people being bullied while the second people refers to the people doing the bullying. It's a bit clearer if you replace some of the nouns - for instance:
dogs people bully bully cats
which I believe is a perfectly legal English sentence.
- maw 16y agodogs people bully bully cats Aha! It finally makes sense. Thanks. You should edit the wikipedia article, because your explanation is way better than the one contained therein.