You're free not to care about inequality, so go for it. I haven't seen any convincing evidence-based argument that a high degree of inequality is either neutra

You're free not to care about inequality, so go for it. I haven't seen any convincing evidence-based argument that a high degree of inequality is either neutral or good for society as a whole, nor do I have any philosophical leanings that suggest that it is an acceptable byproduct of an otherwise fair and just society. Going by both evidence (health outcomes, class mobility, etc) and by my philosophical leanings that it don't seem right for so few people to own so much (when ownership itself is a purely fictional thing), I'm going to keep talking about inequality as a Bad Thing to be addressed. Don't like it? You do you, but telling me I'm focusing my behavior on one thing or another is about the least compelling thing to say.