2 ms·
Obviously they were. The point the parent post is making is that some of these results are old (like, 10 years old). Of course the algo would have changed, and
by ggggtez 9y ago
Obviously they were. The point the parent post is making is that some of these results are old (like, 10 years old). Of course the algo would have changed, and the article even says that it did.
But if no one is searching it, then of course it's just going to be semi-random results.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=%22three%20black%20teenagers%22 https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=%22three%2...
The top related query? "Three white teenagers". It's obvious almost no one searches this term unless they've read the article.