4 ms·
I wish the article had included screen shots of search results for "white girls" and "Asian girls". Would there be any less porn? I strongly doubt it.
by na85 9y ago
I wish the article had included screen shots of search results for "white girls" and "Asian girls".
Would there be any less porn? I strongly doubt it.
- jjeaff 9y ago"Asian girls", maybe. But "white girls" definitely would not have returned porn.
- heavenlyblue 9y agoBut it would include Russian prostitutes.
- treis 9y ago"white girls" returns stuff about the movie white girl "Girls" is the HBO show "Asian girls" is porn lite "Black girls" has no porn for me. Various sites about black girls (black girls code for example)
- quietbritishjim 9y agoThat's because the results in the article are from 2011.
- brighteyes 9y agoIt depends on your search history, actually. I tried "black girls", "white girls", "asian girls" - and also "asian boys" etc. - in various accounts, some of which were used when browsing porn (i.e., home accounts vs accounts used at work), and in both google and bing. In accounts where porn was browsed in the past, porn results were over 50% for all of the above. In others, porn was absent.
- ScottBurson 9y agoExcellent research! You should post this as a root comment so it has a chance of rising to the top.
- prepend 9y agoWhite girls not so much. But Asian girls returns lots of pic sites that aren’t porn but are suggestive. Btw, black girls no longer returns author’s screenshot so google has changed results since this article.
- compiler-guy 9y agoTo do these kinds of tests reasonably, you need to do it from an incognito window or private browsing and clear all history between every search. Even that might not be enough to get the original results, as there are also signals based on location.