4 ms·
I know it's hyperbole and I'm being nit-picky but come on, 100x? 10x already sounds a bit like exaggeration, but implying there's an engineer out there who can
by aylmao 9y ago
I know it's hyperbole and I'm being nit-picky but come on, 100x?
10x already sounds a bit like exaggeration, but implying there's an engineer out there who can do the same amount of work in 3-4 days as a normal engineer in a year is too much lol.
- afinlayson 9y agoDepends on how many direct reports the person can scale to. But I agree 100x is a little high. If you have a 10 person team and they all can do 2x what an unled team, The math might work out to be a 10x team lead. But there I go trying to use Math to justify hyperbole...
- trendia 9y agoI can think of an example, though even this is somewhat of astretch: Suppose person A takes 40 hours to write C code to manipulate a large data set. Person B puts the data in a database and is able to write commands, which only take 10 minutes, to achieve roughly the same thing.
- aylmao 9y agoOh, I can see this, ok. I've spent an hour or so googling and debugging something before asking someone who knows the answer and does it in like 30 seconds hahah. Person A should've considered alternatives and asked around before spending a week on that manipulation lol.
- esturk 9y ago100x'ers do exist. But by Lokta's Law, they occur about 1 in 10000. Usually, a 10x'er is only 1/100 so they are much easier to find. You probably know them as Fellow/Staff Engineers.