He starts off with a straw man. The argument "It isn't a hack" requires people arguing that it was a hack. But actually the reporting is fairly clear that they

He starts off with a straw man. The argument "It isn't a hack" requires people arguing that it was a hack. But actually the reporting is fairly clear that they didn't hack the data. The whole thing reeks of obfuscation and deliberate misinterpretation. Capped off with "sure it's bad but..." just isn't worthwhile if the arguments above were fallacious to begin with.