4 ms·
It seems to me that there are two possibilities, and either way, Hurd should win: 1. It is possible for Hurd to work for Oracle without disclosing HP trade sec
by dfranke 16y ago
It seems to me that there are two possibilities, and either way, Hurd should win:
1. It is possible for Hurd to work for Oracle without disclosing HP trade secrets. Then Hurd is not breaching his agreement by working for them.
2. It is not possible for Hurd to work for Oracle without disclosing HP trade secrets. Then the agreement is a de-facto non-compete agreement, and therefore unenforceable.
- mbreese 16y agoIf this turns out to be the case, the bigger question is whether or not he gets to keep the severance package... If he does end up at Oracle, I suspect that the money given to him by HP to go away too...
- bmelton 16y agoI admittedly don't know the details, but if he has a severance, that usually implies that he was let go. All the non-competes I've ever read were effectively voided in the event of employer termination, unless the severance amount also included a non-compete clause itself.