Maybe a 100% complete social graph is not required, but I suspect social graphs to be more and more important. Facebook is not a 100% social graph anyway. I k

Maybe a 100% complete social graph is not required, but I suspect social graphs to be more and more important. Facebook is not a 100% social graph anyway. I keep business relations to LinkedIn and my Chinese contacts do not use Facebook. People in highly connected points of social graphs provide a valuable service to society, and are using technology to monetize on their contribution. The people are a mix between a tribe leader and a thought leader. They bring people together and help spread ideas. Even in a very monetized network, Youtube, experts believe Influencers receive less compensation than they would with similar audiences in the old media [1]. This undervalue suggests a market imbalance that should correct it self with time. As more money comes into the field the competition will increase and the quality of the product will increase. That is why I think social graphs will become more and more important. [1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelthomsen/2015/07/11/pewdiepie-doesnt-make-anywhere-close-to-what-he-should-be-making/2/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelthomsen/2015/07/11/pewdi...