3 ms·
Thanks for this insight. This is the first time someone gave me arguments that make actual sense, instead of 'wrong information is bad mkey'. I can totally see
by herbst 9y ago
Thanks for this insight. This is the first time someone gave me arguments that make actual sense, instead of 'wrong information is bad mkey'. I can totally see how this is a issue.
However as I see this we can not fix this 'issue' without breaking the Internet.
But I also see that 'free for all' only leads the to rich getting more influence.
- zimablue 9y agoI agree with what I think your perspective is, that the internet is kind of impossible to regulate. But maybe in this situation it's not so impossible to do something useful, Facebook is so effective at the moment because it's a centralized, surveilling monopolistic social network. This centralisation makes them easy to regulate. You can imagine decentralised networks which would be impossible to regulate but it feels like they'd then also be harder for advertisers/propagandists to access effectively and use to control people's ideas.
- herbst 9y agoSo more regulation is a solution? I mean I see what you are getting at. But this is definitly not the direction we as humanity should go. Regulation can and will just lead to information bubbles and yet again giving the power in the wrong hands, but in that case a central authority instead of a open market.