3 ms·
This seems like a misunderstanding of the problem. The problem is that it's very difficult paying attention to something you have no control over or interaction
by slivym 9y ago
This seems like a misunderstanding of the problem. The problem is that it's very difficult paying attention to something you have no control over or interaction with. To stick in a prod to punish people isn't going to make it easier. You'll end up just firing a lot of drivers. What would be better is to give the human something to do. For example you could put a set of input devices in the car for the human: Tell them to record their 'level of confidence' so you can check that against the cars confidence levels, or input suggesting steering adjustments to gauge where the car is differing from normal human behaviour.
That way when your driver has become an active participant (albeit probably useless) in the driving.
- bkor 9y agoTrain drivers are expected do just that. Driving a train has way less interaction than a car. They managed to setup a system (at least in Netherlands) where they do pay attention. Specifically hiring people based on personality/skill, various things in the train, checks, suspension when you miss a red sign, etc. It seems Uber did none of that. It's super obvious the safety driver isn't paying attention. Why wasn't this noticed? Why wasn't a system setup to handle this? It feels like they cut corners.