>which time do you measure? Time-to-first-running-example or Time-to-debugged-productions-ready-code? Had the same experience. Rust feels slower to develop, bu

>which time do you measure? Time-to-first-running-example or Time-to-debugged-productions-ready-code? Had the same experience. Rust feels slower to develop, but the type system just saves you so much headache in the long run that you're usually much faster at reaching your goal. Lack of mature libraries is a normal issue for a language that's 3 years old. It will get better with use.