6 ms·
If you charge the engineers criminally, the result is that they won't cooperate with investigations, and will do their best to cover things up. With "no fault"
by skookumchuck 9y ago
If you charge the engineers criminally, the result is that they won't cooperate with investigations, and will do their best to cover things up.
With "no fault" investigations, the engineers work with the investigators to identify and fix the problems. The result is a lot better than the adversarial system.
- Hydraulix989 9y agoHas there ever been any back-stabbing after the engineers "cooperate" and volunteer potentially self-incriminating information?
- empath75 9y agoWe aren’t talking about a micro service going down, we’re talking about someone dying. If that driver hadn’t been in a self driving car, they’d clearly be going to jail for looking at their phone while driving.
- skookumchuck 9y agoThat's right, we're talking about someone dying. Is it better to have the problem fixed, or better to get revenge? In aviation, for example, some mechanics in Chicago were putting jet engines on using the wrong procedure. This resulted in a crack in the engine mount, the engine fell off during takeoff, resulting in a fiery crash where everyone died. Everyone cooperated with the investigation. The mechanics were not criminally charged. The procedures were changed so it wouldn't happen again. Under your proposal, the shop would have had every incentive to alter records, deny, obfuscate, and in general impede finding the truth as much as possible. Do you think that would have been better? I know of no cases where mechanics, engineers, air traffic controllers, regulators or pilots were criminally charged in a fatal accident. The result is we have incredibly safe air travel. I don't know about you, but I'm happy about that result.