4 ms·
Which is it? You're saying we don't have enough details AND that it's just buggy software.
by atomical 9y ago
Which is it? You're saying we don't have enough details AND that it's just buggy software.
- ajross 9y agoUpthread it was pointed out that the LIDAR manufacturer believes their system was operating correctly. Assuming that, it becomes a software bug more or less by definition. But fine: let's say it was the LIDAR system was at fault. Do they go to jail, then? How about the bureaucrats who approved the test? All this doesn't matter. I'm simply saying that ALL the facts in evidence point to this being a reasonable mistake, and reasonable mistakes don't qualify for negligence prosecution. If you want to argue to the contrary you need evidence, which doens't seem to exist. Therefore the upthread question "shouldn't someone go to jail?" is answered with a firm "no".