4 ms·
Here's the wikipedia entry on this poem along with the audio. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-
by misterbwong 16y ago
Here's the wikipedia entry on this poem along with the audio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_D...
- byw 16y agoIt's interesting to compare the original version in Classical Chinese with the vernacular Chinese one. The Classical Chinese version just sounds (err, reads) so much more awesome, like a smooth-talking wisecrack who can't be bothered to dispense extra breaths, while the vernacular version reads like a seven-year old's essay. I always had the impression that Classical Chinese was painstakingly crafted and preserved by a small group of elitists obsessed with aesthetics and abhorred ease-of-learning. The ultra-minimalist syntax seems very "inorganic", but it makes every line poetry and invitation for puns. As a result, most people were illiterate, but if you were well-read, boy, the fun you could have with words.