3 ms·
This is still a GAN, right? It's running an adversarial system at a level higher than pixel-poking.
by DanielBMarkham 9y ago
This is still a GAN, right? It's running an adversarial system at a level higher than pixel-poking.
- dbranes 9y agoIt's a neural network trained in an adversarial manner which generates things, so yes.
- gwern 9y agoDepends on whether you see the glass half-full or half-empty. Is it a DRL actor-critic where the reward & critic happen to be half of a GAN, or is it a GAN where the generator happens to receive a RL-style loss instead of the normal discriminator loss? Actor-critic and GANs have always been hard to tell apart: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01945.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01945.pdf