> irrespective of whether the topic of their ruling fell within their subject-matter jurisdiction. The opposite. Binding only within their subject-matter juris

> irrespective of whether the topic of their ruling fell within their subject-matter jurisdiction. The opposite. Binding only within their subject-matter jurisdiction. Which is good, because this ruling is so broad it's essentially trying to argue there's no such thing as fair use (because plagiarists arent protected by fair use, and all copyright infringers are plagiarists, and fair use is inherently copyright infringement, therefore...)