> Uber's willingness to incur losses in the name of growth What a delightful euphemism for predatory pricing! Supposing the $10 value in the article were chan

> Uber's willingness to incur losses in the name of growth What a delightful euphemism for predatory pricing! Supposing the $10 value in the article were changed to $6 or $8 or $12 or whatever the correct value is, do you dispute the author's overall point that a huge corporation burning investor money to secure a monopoly and undercut more efficient municipal transport is a bad thing?