3 ms·
Sounds good for the taxi cartels... not good for the drivers who would now have fewer job options and less control over accepting work on their terms. And of c
by rayvd 9y ago
Sounds good for the taxi cartels... not good for the drivers who would now have fewer job options and less control over accepting work on their terms.
And of course a huge blow to consumers which is the whole point of Uber's existence anyway.
- s73v3r_ 9y agoDrivers don't have that now. They have extremely little control over what rides they can turn down, and most drivers barely break even. As for consumers, yes, it's generally felt as a blow when they have to start paying the actual costs of things, instead of coasting by on VC subsidized things.