I've gotta be honest, I feel a bit clickbaited. This piece just provides the standard resolutions to a misbehaving company with a few specifics about Uber but d

I've gotta be honest, I feel a bit clickbaited. This piece just provides the standard resolutions to a misbehaving company with a few specifics about Uber but doesn't mull too long on it's title. Why is it that we even expect a leadership change to substantially alter a company? We've created a system where there is no real accountability for the direction of a company, even it's leaders are bound to shareholders[1] and it's shareholders are dispersed with their demands either hidden from the public eye in the case of VC/PE or mostly abdicated in the case of the public. In our system a corporation with shareholders is just an automaton marching towards profit and nothing else, leadership won't make much of a difference. [1] they aren't really but the popular idea provides cover for them to maximize their own gains via the portion of their pay that is comprised of stock