Title is perfectly accurate imo. The case originally had Oracle seeking 8.8b in damages. Oracle won the revival. Therefore Oracle won the revival of a billion

Title is perfectly accurate imo. The case originally had Oracle seeking 8.8b in damages. Oracle won the revival. Therefore Oracle won the revival of a billion dollar case. The title does not state or imply that google will pay the full amount, only that the case is not dead. I know, click bait is bad, but it really irks me that people on HN are so quick to pull the 'click-bait' card for no reason. Would a different title really change anyone's interpretation of the article? I don't think so.