3 ms·
starts by talking of a method available since 1931, that is fully researched and ignored. then ignores it and focus on vasagel, making it look like vasagel is t
by gcb0 9y ago
starts by talking of a method available since 1931, that is fully researched and ignored. then ignores it and focus on vasagel, making it look like vasagel is the thing tested since the 30s.
what kind of crappy, misleading writing is this? I used to like vice.
- croon 9y agoEither we aren't reading the same article or I'm misunderstanding it. It starts off with the anecdote of having discovered the key parts of making the birth control pill possible, 30 years before it became available, as a preface to the rest of the article: Where it's been 30+ years since the gel (now marketed as vasalgel) was invented in India. I didn't find it misleading at all, but maybe I missed something?