3 ms·

Does oracle have a case or not? If you were Oracle, would you be ok not taking this to court?

• dbbk 9y ago
  They clearly have a case because they just won it.
  • Ajedi32 9y ago
    Yeah, seems a little strange to ask a question like that after the court already ruled in their favor. Whether you like it or not, clearly they did have a case.
• Yetanfou 9y ago
  In this field "having a case" depends not so much on objective truth but on subjective narrative, having enough money to pay more lawyers for a longer time than the opponent, finding the right judge, making sure the jury is stuffed according to plan and more of such skullduggery. If it were about objective facts the case would have been over and done with in a month with a definite conclusion, either it being OK to use API's without licensing or it being a violation to do so. If the outcome were the latter there would have been some bickering over how much to pay for said violation, add another month for that. Alas, this is not about objective truth and "having a case". It is the result of a free but regulated market being infected by a parasitic organism which has turned the regulator's defence mechanisms to its own purpose, the which being the extraction of as much value as feasible while keeping the host alive.
  • AnimalMuppet 9y ago
    The question here is not so much one of fact, but one of law. And stuffing the jury isn't an issue with the appeals court.