> The popular criticism is that Go isn't reinventing enough; that it's stuck in the 70's and it's not sufficiently innovative. That's popular, but unfounded, i

> The popular criticism is that Go isn't reinventing enough; that it's stuck in the 70's and it's not sufficiently innovative. That's popular, but unfounded, in my opinion. I find ironic that some HN commenters are criticizing the Go team for not being stuck in the past when they are precisely trying to innovate and questioning the status quo on package management.