3 ms·
Yes, it is hard to explain. Something about those companies employee shareholders individually having free speech rights via the company that they own. It was a
by neltnerb 9y ago
Yes, it is hard to explain. Something about those companies employee shareholders individually having free speech rights via the company that they own. It was a recent change.
I don't really mind companies lobbying for things, I suspect that it has more good than bad from open lines of communication of needs from the business community. But the balance has to be right. It shouldn't be one company drowning out a million people.
The NRA is at least made up of real human members. Who shockingly donated $85M to them in since 2005. I may dislike their point of view, but they certainly deserve to be able to lobby.
- vijaybritto 9y agoPeople get killed in thousands because of them. I'm not sure if they should enjoy this kind of a freedom!