2 ms·
> It's something the rich choose to do, in collusion with politicians, So legislation purportedly for employee protection backfires by making direct hires unec
by adrianratnapala 9y ago
> It's something the rich choose to do, in collusion with politicians,
So legislation purportedly for employee protection backfires by making direct hires uneconomical and you call this " something the rich choose to do, in collusion with politicians"?
- knuththetruth 9y agoBy an reasonable comparison to other wealthy economies in the developed world, no such labor protections exist in the US. What little protections are in place have been systematically under attack since at least the 1970s. If we we're talking about somewhere like France, perhaps this argument would hold water. Otherwise, seems like a strawman.
- s73v3r_ 9y agoYes, I do. Because it's something they do specifically to avoid responsibility. And the rich are adults, who are perfectly capable of taking responsibility for their actions.