4 ms·
Agreed. 20% margin of error isn't really that relevant to me either. I don't really care that much if I'm 70mg/dl or 100mg/dl if the line is horizontal. Both v
by tomca32 9y ago
Agreed. 20% margin of error isn't really that relevant to me either.
I don't really care that much if I'm 70mg/dl or 100mg/dl if the line is horizontal. Both values are, roughly, in the "OK Zone" that I just don't care about better precision.
Even if I'm going low, the difference between 50 or 70 isn't nearly as relevant as the rate of change. If I'm going down, but the slope is gentle enough, I know I probably don't need much to get back to normal, while if it's steep going down, I probably need to eat something regardless if I'm 50 or 70, or 80.
- daveguy 9y agoIt could also be that the issue isn't the magnitude of the absolute error. It may be that the device is more highly variable in the first hours giving the impression of spikes or drops where there are none. It's hard to tell without the raw data.