>On a global scale, due to interdisciplinary synergies, it seems to exceed 1:1. How does it seem to do that? If you're going to call somebody misleading, might

>On a global scale, due to interdisciplinary synergies, it seems to exceed 1:1. How does it seem to do that? If you're going to call somebody misleading, might as well go through the effort of linking to data that you consider 'not misleading'.