3 ms·
David Spivak has done lots of cool work on applying category theory to many concrete systems like databases [1]. Brendan Fong has worked on applying category t
by danharaj 9y ago
David Spivak has done lots of cool work on applying category theory to many concrete systems like databases [1].
Brendan Fong has worked on applying category theory to things that act like interconnected networks, such as electrical circuits. This fits into a larger ambitious program that John Baez is part of to use category theory to understand physical systems that are still much too complicated to understand with current mathematical tools, such as ecosystems. Fong's thesis is on my reading list [2].
The two authors are doing great research, like this investigation of the algebra of backpropagation [3].
I really look forward to reading this too!
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2012 https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2012
[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05382 https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05382
[3] https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10455 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10455
- thraway180306 9y agoAbout ML-related research, Fong also piqued my interest earlier with his categorification of almost PGMs. Though it didn't inspire him or anyone to bring effective methods of algebra to PGM and improve the base theory, making the exercise really shine. So like with many categorification research it's just a 72-page statement „it can be done”. Brendan Fong (2012) Causal Theories: A Categorical Perspective on Bayesian Networks https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6201 https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6201
- tome 9y agoI made a Haskell Postgres library inspired by David Spivak's work: https://github.com/tomjaguarpaw/haskell-opaleye/ https://github.com/tomjaguarpaw/haskell-opaleye/