3 ms·
> If you want a non-partisan debate, which I do, I think you have to look past this kind of 'who was worse' debate. You can have a "non-partisan" debate while
by chimeracoder 9y ago
> If you want a non-partisan debate, which I do, I think you have to look past this kind of 'who was worse' debate.
You can have a "non-partisan" debate while recognizing that there's an important distinction between applying data to disseminate information in good faith to potential voters and applying data to intentionally disseminate misinformation in concert with a foreign government.
- tatersolid 9y agoYour typical Democrat enthusiast considers the entire Republican platform “disininformation”. And vice versa. That’s truly the root of the problem here: none of the “fanatics” who control the various political organizations on left or the right actually want informed debate. They want to censor the other side entirely.